"Kentuckians will be able to buy "In God We Trust" license plates starting early next year, the state Transportation Cabinet said Friday,"
December 17, 2010.
Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
"Kentuckians will be able to buy "In God We Trust" license plates starting early next year, the state Transportation Cabinet said Friday,"
December 17, 2010.
Since the purchase of the license plates with "In God We Trust" on them will be optional, I certainly think this is legal. I am thankful "In God We Trust" is on our United States currency and look forward to seeing it on many Kentucky license plates.
In the broadest sense of the term, "God" could refer to the highest righteous authority, and perhaps even an atheist could believe in some form of god.
Please feel free to respectfully post your own views on this.
But, please avoid making personal attacks that violate the Newsvine Code of Honor. Also, please avoid using "obscene" or "vulgar" language that violates the Newsvine User Agreement. Thanks!
Indiana has had optional plates available with "In God We Trust" on them for at least a couple of years now. As long as the choice is optional, I agree that it is legal. When I lived there, I opted for the plates without it but I had no problem with those who chose otherwise.
In the broadest sense of the term, "God" could refer to the highest righteous authority...
In the broadest sense it declares the U.S. government of monotheistic religious rule, which is clearly unconstitutional. It violates the rights of pagans, who believe in multiple gods, and atheist who believe in no god. Ask yourself if you would accept the constitutionality of our currency stating "In No God We Trust". Would you?
I agree with the license plates as long as the options are equally available to all, but making that declaration with things like currency and public spaces funded by government taxes is an ongoing violation of the constitution.
GrayHouse, you make good points!
In the broadest sense it declares the U.S. government of monotheistic religious rule, which is clearly unconstitutional.
But personally, I respectfully disagree with the above quote from your comment since I feel that "in the broadest sense," God isn't necessarily always the same one monotheistic "god."
But I do agree with your basic concept in the sense that the monotheistic God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is the one most of us in the United States probably think of when we see the word "God."
God isn't necessarily always the same one monotheistic "god."
yeah.. sorry but that is conveniently spin and most of america do not include the "muslim god" as god or even A god.
And really it is just stupid, and unnecessarily inciteful(bitch later I like the word and you damn well know what it means even if it isnt a real word) for the government to make speciality plates.
MY DL looks like everyone elses DL in the state.
My passport looks like everyone elses in the country.
The Government has no business getting into "flair".. why cant I have a license plate saying god bless the KKK, keeping brown folks in their place for 100 years. Or how about "californians think republican suck" bet you suddenly we would have a lawsuit.
Everything from the government should come in a plain brown wrapper.
There is NO REASON FOR IT.. you can get a bumpsticker.. why the hell should we make slogans on license plates. The only purpose is to cause controversy and to pretend like your group is special.
anyways my state had the "i believe" license plates. They got sued and changed it to "in god we trust" cause scotus already said that was ok for our money.. but that is only cause each and every last one of them is a christian.
the gov has no business promoting any group. These plates should say kentucky and maybe include their motto.. that is it.
Nancy Pelosi said it best in 2006:
"You don't need God anymore, you have us Democrats."?
It just makes you wonder what happened to Kentucky. Southern states were prime for creating the great worker states of this nation, they were the poorer States and then the Republican steps in with its incentives for businesses, lowered tax rates and now the need for govt assistance is lessened, greed has taken over and the worker State is no longer the options it would have been such as under Johnson's Great Society. Pelosi had it right, The Republican once again rears its ugly head, believing in God and full of corporate greed. Too bad the opportunity to create a smoother transistion to the worker state is gone, it would have been better when we did not have to bankrupt the system, or force people into costly social programs, to make the transition. We could have just used the population that had been used to having low income or no jobs and no govt support to create a worker state. Now we are forced to try this again through, those coming across the border, social programs, and over spending. This time we wont fail.
In which case they should also start selling plates for In Man We Trust there is no God since there is not supposed to be a state support for the establishment of religion under the First Ammendment to the Constitution. Or they could offer In Dog We Trust, since I do so love my puppies.
Keep the State Government out of Religion and Religion out of the State Government.
Since the purchase of the license plates with "In God We Trust" on them will be optional, I certainly think this is legal. I am thankful "In God We Trust" is on our United States currency
james
Personalized plates I agree would may "In God We Trust" legal on license plates, however I do do believe it to be legal as used on money. On your check or credit card, fine.
I do believe in God, by the way. Does it say somewhere that God Sanctioned American Money?
Hi James,
I am with you brother!
I am a strong believer in separation of church and state but only because secularism is exclusionary and not something I believe Jesus would have preached.
But we need spirituality in our lives and a periodic reminder of gods plan in life.
Some times just a license plate tag can be enough to make us think outside of our own immediate needs and reflect on how blessd we all are.
1.8 Excuse me, but why is it necessary to put on a government-issued license plate something that could be interpreted as a thing causing others to think that the US or State of Kentucky is forcing some to believe in God?
Is that not leaning in the direction of an illegality? And if it is, is that "Christian"? You see Kentucky doesn't care if it breaks the law to get its political agenda ahead in Washington, so it seems to not care about these plates promoting an ideology that not all Americans agree with. Kentucky feels as though it can do whatever it wishes in contrast to civil rights. Other states such as Texas seems to feel the same way.
Sometimes, just praying privately is enough for me to remember and thank God.
For a actual Christian, that is all that is necessary.
Here is a photo of the Indiana plate that has been available as standard issue since January 2007 (IN GOD WE TRUST with US flag). It is available for the same price as the standard car and truck plate.
https://myweb.in.gov/BMV/mybmvportal/RegistrationsAndPlates/IndianasLicensePlates/IndianasStandardLicensePlates/InGodWeTrustLicensePlate.aspx
And yes, the Indiana courts said it was okay.
A Wadsworth, thanks for the information and links in your comment #1.10!
This is silliness. All they are going to do is end up clogging the courts with people suing them over their non-religious beliefs or Muslims beliefs.Remember, you open the door for a small group of people that believe in all this godly silliness, then you have to open the door for all others to start posting their religions and flags as well.
Religion is a person choice and advertising your religion for me is just another way to manipulate the people in getting them to attend a certain church and being brainwashed in believing in some intangible god.
Wake up people. No god is coming to save you from a thing. Religion is an orgasnized business raking in millions and billions each and every year.
There are some people who would buy that license plate
and that is good..no problem here...then again I had a few folks in
Oregon add to it:
In God We Trust, And Tree Huggers.....just adding a bit of humor today
Every state of the Union could have their own added words
Good article
and perhaps even an atheist could believe in some form of god.
They do, jameseg, they do! Nature can be their god, or evolution, or science that created the theory of evolution, or science itself, but they DO have a god. Everyone does, and there is legal precedent for it.
An open-ended approach to freedom of religion was adopted in the California court in Re Hinckley’s Estate.119 In this case the court said: “The word ‘religion’, in its primary sense…imports, as applied to moral questions, only recognition of a conscious duty to obey restraining principles of conduct. In such sense, we suppose there is no one who will admit that he is without religion.”
I would love to have them if and when my state gets them!!
There is absolutely Nothing wrong with a person's right's in choosing to have them or not.
Sally please include my state of Tennessee in with your over thought diatribe of hate along with Kentuckey and Texas, for we also have in God we Trust License plates and their is nothing you can do about it, our state legislature has approved it, and as a Republican Strong hold and God fearing people you have no say in what we do with our license plates. Sally Im glad "just praying" is enough for you, Im sure you do it while your posting your hatred for what other states think.. praying is not enough for us, we pray, give, comfort, support and Love our neighbors. and mind our own business unlike your kind. God Bless you Sally, your a hiprocite of the first degree...no body cares what you think!!!!!!!
your answer to 1.8 is we dont care what others think, we believe, and you say you are a Christian and you don't know what Jesus said about non-believers
I'm sure it's legal... but I want the plate that says:
In God We Trust
All Others Must Pay Cash
In the broadest sense of the term, "God" could refer to the highest righteous authority, and perhaps even an atheist could believe in some form of god.
I can't speak for everyone, but recognizing the human tendency to create hierarchies, even where they are unnecessary, in order to speak in absolute or superlative terms, like "highest righteous authority", is one of main reasons I am an atheist.
Who cares if some religious-minded person drives around with that on their license plate?
How does that affect anyone else?
Thanks grumpy_jon for what appears to be an insightful quote in italics in your comment #1.15.
But please provide a link to the source. Was it a quote from a comment you made on another Newsvine article?
Since the purchase of the license plates with "In God We Trust" on them will be optional, I certainly think this is legal.
It is legal. Those saying otherwise are ignorant.
CFI's license plate covers are readily available everywhere for everyone who make the smart choice of promoting science and reason.
Terry Yoder, one of the great things about this country is the diversity of opinions that are allowed.
I recently drove through the southern states and was shocked to see vanity plates that had a pro-life message.
If Kentuckians want an IGWT plate I don't see it as an issue, as it's a ubiquitous phrase that appears not only on our currency.
Yes, I know that these people are trying to make a statement that appeals to the christian right, but until we get rid of IGWT at the federal level, they can have it.
we need to take it off our money as well.
besides it is pretty sacrilegious to have it on our money.
we need to take it off our money as well.
besides it is pretty sacrilegious to have it on our money.
I'd have thought so too! To my mind putting that phrase on money is probably one of the greatest insults to god one could make.
Having it on a license plate is a clear indication that the state believes in only one religious belief and all should adhere to it. IMO it is not only insulting, but a clear violation of the first amendment of the constitution. Then again we do have those that belief their state is far more important than their country, while gladly accepting federal funds.
In God we trust, all others must pay cash , if you request credit see our credit officer Helen Wait. Thank you.
Goes along with it's corollary: Jesus Saves, Moses Invests.
Keep Government and Religion OUT of each others spheres of influence. Period.
They are so stupid.
As if we need to have a reminder to trust God. Yay...Kentucky! Question is - if they trust God, why are they not writing it on their foreheads in phylacteries, where the message belongs?
Whatever.
In a way I like it that those kind of people identify themselves on their plates since I've noticed they can be as much a road hog and with quick and emotional impulses as apparent in their driving habits as they maneuvre to show everyone elsewhere in society. I don't mind that they let you know to stay out of their way (and especially on the road)
well when you see the pope behind 5 inches of bullet proof glass, sometimes you have to be reminded of that "trust in god" part.
But people who have these license plates might not be Christian. So, the idea is to promote division. When Kentucky conducts itself as a Christian state that its people claim it to be, I might forgive their hatred. But so long as its politicians encourage the head bashing of women and its citizens steal cars from women because of racism or political hatred, no, people from Kentucky should be ashamed of their conduct.
The motto on the license plate from where I grew up is "Live Free or Die" True Christians feel free in their hearts and there is no need to divide and separate, even under a perception of being persecuted, where I think this is coming from. Kentuckians have been loud in their opposition to the president and the Muslim community.
Fear factor. But, they do not live by what they promote. It makes all Christians look bad and that is what I do not care for.
So, the idea is to promote division.
Great point.
"Hey neighbor, where's YOUR IGWT plate?"
But so long as its politicians encourage the head bashing of women and its citizens steal cars from women because of racism or political hatred, no, people from Kentucky should be ashamed of their conduct.
Sally - Snoopy's Sister, I'm not sure what the above quote from your comment #4.3 is referring to. It seems to be a very unfair stereotype of the people of Kentucky. You may have specific information about specific incidents involving specific politicians or racists, but please don't stereotype all Kentuckians.
Kentucky's state motto is "united we stand, divided we fall." In fact during the Civil War Kentucky had two capitals (and was represented in the flags of both sides) and both Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis had Kentucky ties. But I digress.
Personally, I think allowing this license plate for those who choose to purchase it seems to be a step toward accommodating many who would like it, while not imposing on others to buy it.
Everyone, please comment respectfully and avoid stereotypes and personal attacks. Thanks!
I would think anyone who is secure in their faith would not need to advertise it. Nor would they feel the need to make others uncomfortable because of their need to push their own beliefs.
I'm thinking these folks are either very insecure that their beliefs/religion is correct or they know deep down their religion is all make believe horse pucky. They certainly do not act in the manner in which their Jesus taught one should act.
deMamma your insecure if God makes you uncomfortable, you say "their" religion (God) then you go on to say in the manner "their" Jesus taught one should act.. how do you know what he taught, its plain you dont believe in and hate our God, so how did you become so astute to our Gods teachings and be able to tell us how he wants us to live ??
Never once have I ever stated that I hate your god, or that he makes me uncomfortable. Although some Christians do make me uncomfortable and wary through their unstable mindset and actions.
I have, however, read the bible cover to cover more than once. (it is a great read with some really good stories) I do understand what it says and means. It is always surprising to see and hear such judgmentalism, hatred, selfishness and other negative attributes and attitudes directed towards others by self professed Christians.
good going, I like the idea very much. In God We Trust. I know I do.
What happens when someone with an "In God We Trust" plate gets into a bad accident. Does that mean God wasn't trustworthy?
bonus,, God doesn't drive, he expects us to.. (sorry I was trying to make a "funny")
But I gotta admitt some Christians go over board with this stuff. One of the guys I attend church with tells me that he "prays" when driving, that it is his time to talk with God. I told him I would rather he prayed at home, church or anywhere else just about,,,But I would truly like it if when he drove a Car he payed full attention to driving !
Arazonia....some people go overboard with tattoos, hairstyles, clothing, drugs, eating, anything you want to name, and they have a right to do so under our constitution, Soooo whats your point,are some believers a bit over zealous...well YES.. thats America
"In God we trust." Well, we certainly can't trust the religious community, and certainly no one has ever given a reason to trust them.
JAMESEG I love your short bio, very telling:
I am a pro-life, "Basically Pacifistic" ecumenical Christian.
The best kind of religious person, the non-practicing type!
Happy Holidays!
King Dave, thanks!
I am sorry to have to admit you are right about "the religious community." But the marvelous teachings of Jesus and other spiritual leaders stand tall.
Jesus' teachings to love even one's enemies and Buddha's apparent teaching to "be good and do good" offer excellent guidance for those seeking to obey the highest righteous authority, which as a Christian I consider to be God.
Happy holidays to you, too, King Dave! Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, and/or any other holidays you celebrate for good.
I'm not able to justify these Jesus Biblical quotes. Why would any true peace lover?
But the marvelous teachings of Jesus and other spiritual leaders stand tall.Jesus' teachings to love even one's enemies:
Except for these:
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34
4) Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children according to Old Testament law. Mark.7:9-13 "Whoever curses father or mother shall die" (Mark 7:10)
Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: “He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.” (Matthew 15:4-7)
No! Don't kill children no matter what Jesus says. Tell him to keep his heavenly rewards!
Jesus has a punishment even worse than his father concerning adultery: God said the act of adultery was punishable by death. Jesus says looking with lust is the same thing and you should gouge your eye out, better a part, than the whole. The punishment under Jesus is an eternity in Hell. (Matthew 5:27)
Happy Holidays, regardless.
King Dave, I repeat my Happy Holidays greetings to you as well.
Regarding your quotes in comment #7.2:
Jesus often spoke in parables. I don't think when taken in the context of all Jesus' teachings recorded in the gospels that he intended such harm as you mention literally. (Recall the story in John 8 about a woman caught in adultery who was condemned to be stoned to death under the law and Jesus admonished that a sinless person ought cast the first stone.)
But we are digressing from the topic of this article. I apologize for leading us into this digression.
Thanks for your insights! And I am thankful that we have the freedom to enjoy a diverse variety of opinions.
Can a Kentucky driver get "In Goddess We Trust" or "In Gods We Trust" or do you have be a male monotheist? Actually, the compulsion to plaster one's religious beliefs all over the place is dumb and really shallow, but this sort of trivialization of spiritual thought seems to be all the rage among the more insecure people in our society. It's the McDonald's version of religion. I guess it makes sense in our substanceless culture.
Great that they are doing this, however, some people would find fault with anything.
Merry Christmas!
that is a great idea and i wholeheartly support for those who believe in god let show the world and mankind whose side we stand on as foe me and my household we in the father the son and the holy ghost these three are equal in power glory and essences.i belive john 3.16 for god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. that who so ever believed in him would have eternal life.
John,
I couldn't agree with you more, and am waiting for my "Jesus Loves You, Everyone Else Thinks You're Pretty @!$%#ed Up" personalized license plates to arrive. Oh, /sarc/.
...show the world and mankind whose side we stand on.
To what end? Why do people feel the need to express their opinions and allegiances on their cars?
No one cares.
If no one cared, as you say...no one would be arguing about it here....would they? LOL
If people without a belief in God don't care about others expressing opinions on vanity styled license plates....they wouldn't be freaking out about an OPTIONAL plate with "In God We Trust" on it ... now would they. Too funny.
when the end of times i want to be in the hills of ky because it will be closer to god
For the End Timers do the world a favor, avoid the rush leave early.
CynicL1,,,Actually that what all Christians believe in. If you read the book of "Revelations" in the Bible you'll understand what I mean. As it the ones that don't go first and are left behind that truly have lot to worry about !
There is nothing in the NT including John of Padmos' schizophrenic rant that talks about the most faithful getting a direct flight to heaven prior to all of the alleged very bad times and pre-Jesus' 2nd coming. The Rapture- it ain't in there.
But I know, it sounds good so let's just believe!
s/
For those who want to buy that plate...they can. For those who don't...no harm, no foul.
Welcome to America!
Y'all know, proclaiming your trust in god, on currency or even vanity plates, is only lip service, right?
I have little issue with an optional "In God We Trust" on someone's license plate. I DO have an issue with it on our money. It carries the idea that we, as a nation, put our trust in God, which is patently false. This is a secular nation, not a Abrahamic monotheistic one.
When will people grasp that concept. The fact that "In God We Trust" is the official motto of the United States is DISGUSTING.
Its NOT a secular nation. You may want it to be, but saying it over and over again does not make it so.
However, I do respect your right to think what you wish...so respect mine, and others, that want to place God on their cars.
I do not have that on my tags, but now that I've seen that it irritates Liberals, I am going to have it on all of my gas-hogging, non-green, fossil fuel-eating cars in my family.
Its NOT a secular nation. You may want it to be, but saying it over and over again does not make it so.
Are you serious? This nation has no official religion and does not follow any religious law. The citizens may be believers, but the government is 100% secular. Our Constitution makes it PRETTY clear that we are not to establish any form of national religion or promote religion in any way. Sounds pretty secular to me.
I do not have that on my tags, but now that I've seen that it irritates Liberals, I am going to have it on all of my gas-hogging, non-green, fossil fuel-eating cars in my family.
Fine by me. As long as people can opt out of the plates, I have no issue. And if you want to spend and arm and a leg in gas every day, by all means, have at it. I hope that you never end up in a position where gas prices are so high that you cant afford it anymore.
You are correct, there is no official religion in the US.
But,
The GOVERNMENT is NOT the people...its the people that make this a non-secular country.
Remember...Government exists to serve the people, not the other way around.
Why does it bother you? Really its on money ohhh noes. Im an Atheist. Your a Door Knocking Atheist I see. Ohh noes its a cross my eyes are bring. Who cares. Its a word.
Why does it bother you? Really its on money ohhh noes. Im an Atheist. Your a Door Knocking Atheist I see. Ohh noes its a cross my eyes are bring. Who cares. Its a word.
I happen to believe in upholding what this country stands for, and that includes ensuring that this country remains secular. This nation was not set up as a God-loving theocracy, so why should our motto imply that we do?
Our Constitution makes it PRETTY clear that we are not to establish any form of national religion or promote religion in any way.
No, it actually doesn't. Our Constitution makes it PERFECTLY CLEAR that people are free to worship as they choose, and that the government can not force any single denomination of religion on the people as was being done in England.
The Declaration of Indpendence, the Mission Statement for America, makes it clear the intention of our forefathers regarding God:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The DOI CLEARLY states that we are ENDOWED BY OUR CREATOR with certain unalienable Rights. Our rights come from Creator, not from government.
Those rights include the right not to believe in a creator, however nothing in the Consitution states that nothing religous can be seen, used, etc. in anything governmental!
...any single denomination of religion...
Wow, your statement is so convoluted I don't know where to start.
The Declaration of Independence has nothing to do with the binding of laws, nor governance of the United States. It was simply a declaration to Britain that the colonies would no longer be under British law. Then we had the Articles of Confederation that ruled government. And now we have the Constitution.
The Constitution only mentions anything remotely having to do with god, gods, creators, or religion in two places, and both of those mention religion only to be very clear that religion would have no place in the governing of the United States. One says that no laws regarding religion can be established, and the other states that no religious test can be used for political office; and of course it was also clear that people would be free to practice religion (or lack thereof) as they wished.
It is very clear in the Constitution that the United States government is secular. It doesn't say that the people of the country are secular, just that liberty and freedom require religion and government to stay apart.
And it has nothing to do with denomination. It has to do with ANYTHING religious. The founders were clear that jews, hindus, athiests, agnostics, pagans, muslims, christians, and even worshipers of the flying spaghetti monster would be free to both practice as they wished and be free from a government that promoted a religion of any kind. The Constitution is completely clear that nothing religious should be seen, used, etc. in anything governmental.
WRONG Grayson. I think you are confusing your statement with mine when you use the word "convoluted". The Constitution prevents the government from forcing any one religion. That same Constitution provides for the freedom to worship where we choose. So, if I want to stand up and say an opening prayer at the city council meeting, I have every right to do so - just as you have every right to not participate in that prayer! People have gone overboard and taken away the rights of those who wish to practice religion where they choose! What is wrong with prayer during government meetings? Is everyone present required to participate in the prayer?? NO!!! Are the rights of those who WANT to pray and are afforded those rights in the Constitution less than the rights of those who do not want to pray? NO!! We could go back and forth on this all day, but I am not going to waste my time. NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that nothing "religious" can be done on government property, but those who don't believe are so insecure in their "non-belief" that they feel threatened by anything religious. I know one thing Grayson, if I didn't believe, I sure as hell wouldn't get my panties in a bunch if someone wanted the Ten Commandments to be displayed at a government building! Why on earth would I care if I didn't believe in it? Why would I seek to deprive those who do believe of the right to see it if they wanted? After all, if I don't want to see it, all I have to do is look away. Easy enough.
You can THINK what you want, it's a free country. But you are wrong wrong wrong. Wrong! The Constitution absolutely DOES NOT CLEARLY show that this is a secular country. The interpretation is WIDE!!!!!!!!
Good day! :-)
Yes, we could go on all day, but I'll just add a couple of key points.
One is that you say, "the Constitution prevents the government from forcing any one religion." That's completely incorrect. I know that's how you interpret it. You think it's about denomination, but it's not. The Constitution doesn't say "one religion", it says "religion". That means ALL religion... EVERYTHING religious. I doesn't ban laws from any one religion. It bans laws from all religion.
The second issue you bring up is the Ten Commandments. Of course you believe it's fine to carve those on government walls because it's of your religion. We've seen recent outrage about Sharia law. I'm certain there would be outrageous protest if a judge wanted to carve the tenets of Islamic law on his courtroom wall. I'd even bet you'd "get your panties in a bunch" if that happened, even though you are secure in your Christian belief.
Of course you don't have to worry about that and are all for religion on government time and property as long as your religion is in the majority. That's what the founding fathers saw and they wanted to protect religious freedom and liberty of the minority too. So ALL religion, including the Ten Commandments, crosses on the highway, prayer in public school, etc is unconstitutional. You're free to do what you want on your time and property, but the founding fathers wanted you to keep your religion, as well as everyone else's religion, out of our government.
It's not about denomination, it's about religion, the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, esp. a personal God or gods.
Its NOT a secular nation. You may want it to be, but saying it over and over again does not make it so.
The Founding fathers, the Constitution, and the SCOTUS all disagree with you!
...its the people that make this a non-secular country.
Actually, it's the Constitution, as the foundation of this country, which makes us a secular nation. Just because many people in this country have a religious belief does not mean the country (sepecially the government) is religiously based.
Our Constitution makes it PERFECTLY CLEAR that people are free to worship as they choose, and that the government can not force any single denomination of religion on the people as was being done in England.
The government also cannot endorse or prohibit any religion or religious cativity. Or are you unfamiliar with the separation of church and state?
The Declaration of Indpendence, the Mission Statement for America, makes it clear the intention of our forefathers regarding God:
The Dec of Independence only establishes our sovereinty as a nation and lists our greivances with the King of England.
we are ENDOWED BY OUR CREATOR with certain unalienable Rights. Our rights come from Creator, not from government.
Which "creator" would that be? That's a rather ambiguous use of the term.
however nothing in the Consitution states that nothing religous can be seen, used, etc. in anything governmental!
Hello! Separation of Church and State!
The Constitution prevents the government from forcing any one religion. That same Constitution provides for the freedom to worship where we choose.
Once again, the Constitution also intends for the government to be separate from religious functions or prevent religious ideology from being made into public policy. GrayHouse nailed it!
People have gone overboard and taken away the rights of those who wish to practice religion where they choose!
What rights have been lost exactly?
What is wrong with prayer during government meetings?
It can be construed as a government endorsement of a religious function or activity. Hence, unconstitutional and open to legal action.
NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that nothing "religious" can be done on government property,
Separation of church and state, again! You really should brush up on constitutional and SCOTUS law before you post.
Why on earth would I care if I didn't believe in it?
Why should the government validate someone's beliefs over another's or non-beliefs?
Why would I seek to deprive those who do believe of the right to see it if they wanted?
You want to see it, set up something on your property or church. Don't expect the government to do it for you. Why should I be forced to see it or have my government put your beliefs over mine (or non-beliefs)?
After all, if I don't want to see it, all I have to do is look away. Easy enough.
Then you clearly missed the point!
The Constitution absolutely DOES NOT CLEARLY show that this is a secular country. The interpretation is WIDE
Your interpretation maybe. The Founding Fathers and the SCOTUS interpretations are the ones which count and they disagree with your "interpretations." What makes you a better authority on the Founding Fathers or the Constitution than the SCOTUS?
I do not have that on my tags, but now that I've seen that it irritates Liberals, I am going to have it on all of my gas-hogging, non-green, fossil fuel-eating cars in my family.
And you think that's truly christian and American, really? See in god he trusts!
Its called "Freedom"...
Look it up...
and Merry Christmas!
Its called "Freedom"...
Absolutely true!!!
But it's not called christian or American. You look that up!!!
I deleted dstgfvdtgvdf's comment #20 for being advertising spam. Ibln28r's comment below was deleted before I saw it, probably by Newsvine administrators for the same reason.
I think most people are getting their knickers in a bunch too easily on this one.
It's just a freaking license plate! One that is OPTIONAL!
Get a grip, folks! Aren't there more important things to get ourselves excited about happening in our country and our world? LOL
I deleted tryrt6u's comment #21 below for being advertising spam.
Thats cool.
Now it just highlights the drivers to either flip off or cut off.
What was it Palin said (paraphrased to fit this)....
Or that license plate you see on the next Dodge Ram driving by, a religious license plate , you should stop the driver and say, ‘So, how is that seperation of church and state thing working out for you?”
How is that separation of church and state going thing working out for you ?
Pretty well if your name is Jessie Jackson.
Not so well , if you believe, the AL Bore , gubment , has no business telling churches who can or can't marry
And the Dodge driver will probably reply, "I don't consider them seperate."
Hey it's cool...you guys have your minor "victory" over having a license plate praising god in some third world state.
Meanwhile, DADT repeal is about to pass the senate. 2 hours to go.
Lose a battle, win the war.
Thats what it is Angry, your so smart, you've got it all figgured out don't you.. you just won a battle yourself, the war begins Jan 5th 2011, remember that date wise one and in 2012 we shall see who has won the war.. keep telling us what we can and can't do in this free country(like license plates and happy meals) you think Nov 5th was a stomping, next whipping will be an earth quake...
Sure it will....the republicans have 2 years to remind America about the messes they create.
payasyougo,
I've refrained on two of your previous posts from pointing out the obvious, but third time's a charm. Don't you think you're sounding a bit too much like a prickly pride-wounded xtian yourself? Was there a war? And am I to believe that somehow you won?
Yoy can really tell the Bigots from the "live and let live" crowd. It seems they are only happy when they can control the thoughts and beliefs of others. Too bad huh? My belief in MY God shouldn't bother those that claim to believe in Freedom. Who else do they hate?
After presidential speaches does the president say,God Bless America? Why do we always here, Gods speed?
shhhh ! , Our MR.Soros funded, look to a couch jumping (Tom cruise) new age, comrades , don't want it to get out !
But , The commander-in-chief , also places his hand on the BIBLE , and takes an oath !
Let me guess God is once again threatning to invade the hallowed halls of liberalism? Its a bloody car tag that can be purchased through a PERSONAL choice( libs would do away with that choice thing if they could) it is not a states declaration of religion but of a for profit agency meeting a demand.
I don't believe in the ultimate fairy tale, but this option is just fine with me. It harms no one and is simply another form of personalizing a plate...I see plates which reflect inferences to Darwin as well as to Jesus, rainbows, and on and on...it's not an issue with any gravity whatsoever.
Wow....the voice of cool calm reason is heard. Thank you!!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |