"Couples who live together are twice as likely to break up as married partners, according to an official analysis"
in the United Kingdom.
Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
"Couples who live together are twice as likely to break up as married partners, according to an official analysis"
in the United Kingdom.
Statistics can be interpreted in various ways. But I consider this supportive of building a relationship slowly and becoming married before being sexually active or living together.
Please feel free to respectfully post your own views on this.
But, please avoid making personal attacks that violate the Newsvine Code of Honor. Also, please avoid using "obscene" or "vulgar" language that violates the Newsvine User Agreement. Thanks!
"The survey of hundreds of thousands of families found that four out of five married couples were still together after ten years. "
This conflicts with other statistics I've heard that 1/2 of marriages end in divorce. Which is it?
But to comment on my personal views, I think it has a lot to do with the intent and committment of the individuals involved. I have lived with many people (male and female) that I was not in the kind of relationship with that involved a commitment to stay together past our shared obligation of the rent (even if those relationships also involved sex). Some cohabiting relationships are nothing more than roomates with benefits. To compare that relationship to marriage is silly. It is simply not the same thing as a committed couple who have for whatever reason chosen not to officially document their relationship with the government. Many people take their commitment to each other very seriously without legally documenting it. For those people their relationship may be as strong or stronger than many married couples.
If they plan to have children together and both parties are involved in the decision, they are likely to feel obligated to help each other parent those children even if they split up (married or not) or even to stay together because of the kids. I don't know if men in particular feel the same obligation to a child that came along on accident or surprise in a relationship that they didn't have the intent of continuing. I'm curious about that myself. I would like to hear what others think about that.
At my age (40), there is no way I would marry someone without living with them first. I like to know what I am getting myself into.
That's just me.
Thanks for sharing your perspective, menmy2.
Personally, I am the opposite. I would not want to be intimate with someone without marrying them.
But I would want to take much time to try to get to know them very well first.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |